Enlist Duo survives 9th Circuit; sorghum growers seek Sulfoxaflor
WASHINGTON, Jan. 27, 2016 - The Ninth Circuit won’t suspend
the registration of Dow AgroSciences’ Enlist Duo herbicide. EPA will have to
make the decision after additional review.
The federal appeals court in San Francisco denied the EPA’s
request for “voluntary vacatur” of the herbicide’s registration, “without
prejudice to the rights of either party to litigate that question before the
agency.”
But in a three-paragraph ruling, the court on Monday granted
EPA’s motion for remand, meaning the agency will have another crack at
reviewing data on the synergistic effects of the two ingredients in Enlist Duo
– glyphosate and 2,4-D.
In
December, when farm groups were calling for EPA to withdraw its motion
before the court, EPA told Agri-Pulse it wanted to take another look at
Enlist because it had received new information from Dow AgroSciences, the
registrant of Enlist Duo, suggesting that acting together, 2,4-D and glyphosate
could be more toxic to non-target plants.
“Dow had not provided this information to EPA prior to EPA
issuing the Enlist Duo registration. EPA has not yet completed its review of
the new information.” The information, EPA said, “could lead (it) to a
different decision on the restrictions for using Enlist Duo. Specifically, this
could result in changes to the width around application areas of no-use buffer
zones that EPA imposed to protect unintended plants, including those listed as
endangered.”
Environmental and food safety groups had cheered
the agency’s decision in November to seek temporary cancellation of the
registration while it examined the effects on federally listed species of the
herbicide, a combination of 2,4-D and glyphosate. When EPA asked the court to
act, Dow said it was voluntarily
suspending sales and said it expected to have the remaining questions
resolved in time for the 2016 planting season.
Dow, however, also argued that the court should not decide
the registration question. “(A)n agency’s desire for an opportunity to review
an earlier decision in light of new information provides no basis for either
the agency or a court summarily to annul that decision,” the company argued to
the court in a Dec. 7 brief.
Glyphosate is under the microscope in another venue: The
state of California is considering
adding the herbicide to its list of chemicals “known to cause cancer,”
because of the finding by the International Agency for Research on Cancer that
glyphosate is probably carcinogenic to humans. In June, IARC classified 2,4-D
as “possibly
carcinogenic to humans.”
Sulfoxaflor and
sugarcane aphids. In an unrelated development, unusually high
populations of sugarcane aphids have prompted Texas sorghum growers to ask EPA
to let them use the Dow insecticide sulfoxaflor,
whose registration
was pulled in November.
Growers are requesting to “make no more than two
applications at a rate of 0.75 -1.5 ounces of product per acre or a seasonal
maximum application rate of 3 ounces of product per acre per year, resulting in
the use of 70,314 gallons of product,” EPA said in a Federal Register notice.
A maximum of 3 million acres of sorghum fields (both grain
and forage) could be treated. The Texas Department of Agriculture said the
aphids can “cause direct plant death” from feeding “as well as indirect damage
and harvesting problems from the aphid honeydew residue in Texas sorghum
fields.”
EPA said that there are currently no registered insecticides
“or any economically or environmentally feasible alternative control practices
available to adequately control this non-routine pest infestation. The state
has asserted that without the use of sulfoxaflor, uncontrolled aphid
infestations are likely to result in significant economic losses.” The agency
will accept comments for 15 days.
The Section 18 application, named for the part of the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act that governs exemptions, was
officially made by the TDA.
#30
For more news, go to: www.Agri-Pulse.com